The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Planting trees not always an effective way of binding carbon dioxide

A magnifying held towards greenary but shows industry polluting air. Photo montage.
Image: IStock

Tree-planting has been widely seen as an effective way of binding carbon as carbon dioxide levels rise in the atmosphere. But now, BECC researcher Louise C Andresen among others, are warning that forests on nutrient-poor land won’t be an additional carbon sink in the long term. As forests age, their uptake of CO2 declines and, each time forests are planted, there is a risk of additional carbon being released from the soil.

BECC researcher at Gothenburg University, Louise C Andresen, is one of the researchers behind a new study which shows that forests on nutrient-poor land won’t be an additional carbon sink in the long term. As forests age, their uptake of CO2 declines and, each time forests are planted, there is a risk of additional carbon being released from the soil.

Further reading

Continue reading the article on Gothenburg University website:

Planting trees not always an effective way of binding carbon dioxide

The study was published in Global Change Biology

Links across ecological scales: Plant biomass responses to elevated CO2